Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
Maren Eltze (she/her/hers)
PhD Student
Boston University, United States
Loran Gliford
PhD Student
Boston University, United States
Jason Heier, PhD
Post-Doctoral Associate
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, United States
Samson Joseph
Researcher 1
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, United States
Laurie Parker, PhD
Associate Professor of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, United States
Erica Pratt, PhD (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Enzymes responsible for post-translational modifications (PTMs) make up around 5% of the proteome, yet are responsible for dynamically regulating the activity of nearly all proteins1,2. Kinases are critical in many signaling pathways that regulate cell life and death, such as metabolism, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis3. Due to their importance in cell regulation, kinases are frequently dysregulated in cancers4. Kinase signaling could be an invaluable biomarker-stratification tool for tumors, elucidating the functional consequences of upstream genomic alterations. However, profiling kinase activity in complex and heterogenous clinical specimens is technically challenging. Background activity from non-cancerous cells can result in a low assay signal-to-noise ratio. Current assays that measure enzymatic activity in intact whole cells, such as in-cell ELISA and DELFIA, do not have the sensitivity to analyze samples with low tumor cell purity. In contrast, cell-deliverable artificial peptide probes enable straightforward live-cell measurement of endogenous PTM enzyme activity5–7. These cell-deliverable peptide probes consist of three modules 1) an enzyme-specific reporter sequence, 2) a bioconjugation handle for detection and readout, and 3) a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) for rapid non-cytotoxic cellular internalization. By using a tumor-type specific CPP, our goal is to develop a tumor-homing artificial peptide probe. Our approach would enable direct profiling of oncogenic PTM enzyme activity in complex biological specimens. Here we present a new colorectal cancer (CRC)-targeting artificial peptide probe for Src family kinases. Targeting Src kinases is an ideal model system due to their importance in oncogenesis in CRC and other solid tumors8.
Probe design: We synthesized two Src-Family Artificial Substrate Peptide (SFAStide) probes. SFAStide-TAT is a well-validated artificial probe6 that uses a modified TAT9–11 CPP for cell-agnostic delivery. SFAStide-CPP2 uses the same enzyme-specific reporter sequence with a novel CPP reported as CRC-specific 12. Kinase assay: Biochemical performance of each probe was evaluated as previously described13. Briefly, kinase assays were performed using purified SRC kinase (SignalChem), peptide probe, and ATP in reaction buffer. Samples of the reaction were quenched at various timepoints. The amount of phosphorylated probe was measured at each time point by ELISA. Cellular uptake/internalization: To evaluate SFAStide-CPP2 peptide uptake specificity, 10 µM FAM-conjugated SFAStide-CPP2 peptides were incubated with LoVo (colorectal cancer), and K562 (leukemia) cells. These samples were then imaged using an IX-83 inverted microscope, and ImageJ was used to measure corrected total region fluorescence for all cells in a representative image. Cells were manually segmented in ImageJ. The ratio of peptide fluorescence to live cell fluorescence was used to quantify peptide uptake. Cell viability with biosensor: The effect of SFAStide-TAT and SFAStide-CPP2 on viability was evaluated through incubating LoVo cells with increasing concentrations of exogenous probes (5, 10, 20, and 30 µM). Viability was then determined using a Countess 3 Cell Counter.
For the proposed SFAStide-CPP2 peptide probe to evaluate PTM enzyme activity in heterogeneous samples, it needs to be cell-specific, while maintaining the ability to act as a Src substrate in live cells, as had been demonstrated with SFAStide-TAT.
Changing the cell transduction module from TAT (SFAStide-TAT) to a CRC-specific CPP (SFAStide-CPP2) did not inhibit SFAStide phosphorylation by the kinase. Under matched experimental conditions, measured V0 was 530.4 pmol/min for SFAS-TAT and 5339 pmol/min for SFAS-CPP2 (p = 0.200, Mann Whitney U Test). The reaction progress curves show SFAStide-CPP2 probe is rapidly phosphorylated with a robust signal that is readily detected by ELISA (Fig 1A). The phosphorylation profile of SFAStide-CPP2 suggests that the peptide probe can be modified for cell-type specificity without compromising its ability to measure Src kinase activity.
The SFAStide-CPP2 peptide probe enables preferential targeting of colorectal cancer cells. When colorectal (LoVo) and leukemia (K562) cells were incubated with FAM-conjugated SFAStide-CPP2, the average normalized FAM fluorescence was two times higher for LoVo compared to K562 (p=0.001, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s Post-hoc test) (Fig 1C). These preliminary data suggest that introducing a cell-specific transduction element could enhance assay signal-to-noise ratio in complex biological matrices.
While the specific uptake mechanism for the novel CRC-specific CPP is unknown, SFAStide-CPP2 probe internalization has no significant effect on cell viability. Average cell viability remained above 89% for cells incubated with either probe across a range of concentrations (0-30 μM). At highest exogenous probe concentration, cell viability was 95.3% for the SFAStide-TAT group versus 89.7% for the SFAStide-CPP2 group. There is little to no difference in cell viability between untreated LoVo cells (92.7% viability) and cells incubated with SFAStide-TAT (p=0.989) or SFAStide-CPP2 (p=0.136) peptide probes (one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc test). (Fig 1C). These findings suggest that the SFAStide-CPP2 probe is a promising candidate for targeted cell-based PTM activity profiling in colorectal cancer.
References
1. Liddy KA, White MY, Cordwell SJ. Functional decorations: post-translational modifications and heart disease delineated by targeted proteomics. Genome Med. 2013 Feb 28;5(2):20.
2. Ramazi S, Zahiri J. Post-translational modifications in proteins: resources, tools and prediction methods. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2021 Apr 7;2021:baab012. PMCID: PMC8040245
3. Bhullar KS, Lagarón NO, McGowan EM, Parmar I, Jha A, Hubbard BP, Rupasinghe HPV. Kinase-targeted cancer therapies: progress, challenges and future directions. Mol Cancer. 2018 Feb 19;17(1):48.
4. Sousa A, Dugourd A, Memon D, Petursson B, Petsalaki E, Saez-Rodriguez J, Beltrao P. Pan-Cancer landscape of protein activities identifies drivers of signalling dysregulation and patient survival. Mol Syst Biol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2023 Mar 9;19(3):e10631.
5. Yang TY, Eissler CL, Hall MC, Parker LL. A multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method to detect Bcr-Abl kinase activity in CML using a peptide biosensor. PloS One. 2013;8(2):e56627. PMCID: PMC3577862
6. Lipchik AM, Perez M, Bolton S, Dumrongprechachan V, Ouellette SB, Cui W, Parker LL. KINATEST-ID: a pipeline to develop phosphorylation-dependent terbium sensitizing kinase assays. J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Feb 25;137(7):2484–2494. PMCID: PMC4342272
7. Ouellette SB, Noel BM, Parker LL. A Cell-Based Assay for Measuring Endogenous BcrAbl Kinase Activity and Inhibitor Resistance. PLOS ONE. Public Library of Science; 2016 Sep 6;11(9):e0161748.
8. Kim LC, Song L, Haura EB. Src kinases as therapeutic targets for cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. Nature Publishing Group; 2009 Oct;6(10):587–595.
9. Frankel AD, Pabo CO. Cellular uptake of the tat protein from human immunodeficiency virus. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1189–1193. PMID: 2849510
10. Mann DA, Frankel AD. Endocytosis and targeting of exogenous HIV-1 Tat protein. EMBO J. 1991 Jul;10(7):1733–1739. PMCID: PMC452844
11. Vives E, Charneau P, van Rietschoten J, Rochat H, Bahraoui E. Effects of the Tat basic domain on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transactivation, using chemically synthesized Tat protein and Tat peptides. J Virol. 1994 May;68(5):3343–3353. PMCID: PMC236825
12. Kondo E, Saito K, Tashiro Y, Kamide K, Uno S, Furuya T, Mashita M, Nakajima K, Tsumuraya T, Kobayashi N, Nishibori M, Tanimoto M, Matsushita M. Tumour lineage-homing cell-penetrating peptides as anticancer molecular delivery systems. Nat Commun. Nature Publishing Group; 2012 Jul 17;3(1):951.
13. Kruk M, Widstrom N, Jena S, Wolter NL, Blankenhorn JF, Abdalla I, Yang TY, Parker LL. Assays for tyrosine phosphorylation in human cells. Methods Enzymol. 2019 Jan 1;626:375–406. PMCID: PMC7379381