Tissue Engineering
Grace B. Neven
Student
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
Monument, Colorado, United States
Jordan Hoops
PhD Candidate
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, United States
Travis Walker
Associate Professor
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, United States
Tugba Ozdemir
Assistant Professor
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, United States
Silk Extraction Regenerated SF was produced following the methods reported earlier (Ugur’paper).
Microparticle Preparation and Characterization Briefly, 4% w/v silk solution was added dropwise to pure acetone solution and was sonicated and sonicated for 30 minutes with a 50% amplitude with 30 second pulses. Afterwards, the solution was left out overnight in the fume hood and stirred. The remaining dried particles were then crushed with a mortar and pestle and set aside. SF-PEI particles were prepared similarly only with addition of PEI in acetone solution during particle preparations
Electrospinning Silk fibroin was combined with different concentrations of PEI and electrospinning was performed following the conditions summarized in Table 1.
Antibacterial Test: Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (ATC 39327) was used to study the antibacterial effects of SF and PEI particles. The bacterial solution was diluted to 0.5 CFU (OD600 nm) before seeding. Briefly SF only and SF/PEI particles and nanofibers will be “sandwiched” between 2 ml of nutrient agar. This will be done by allowing the first 1 ml of agar to solidify before adding particles after 10-15 minutes, and then adding the second 1 ml. The solution was allowed to solidify before bacterial solution was thinly spread.
Mechanical Testing: Based on antibacterial activity, the experimental nanofibril material discs will be reproduced and analyzed by Dynamic Mechanical analysis to understand the difference between the particles embedded verse the nanofibers embedded in agar.
Results:
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis was performed using a Malvern NanoZS zetasizer and based on the initial experiments the particle size was reported to be 598.7 nm with a poly dispersity index of 0.407 as shown in Fig 2. Separately, polyblend electrospinning was performed to produce nanofibers. Table 1 details the conditions which were optimized to achieve the mats shown in Figure 3. The mats are intact and nanofiber structures were confirmed with Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (SF nanofiobers only) with thin coating. Ongoing experiments are focusing on increasing the mat size and characterizing the morphological properties of the membranes. Furthermore, coaxial electrospinning will be performed to increase sustainability of PEI based antibacterial effect.
Discussion
In this study we would like to achieve antibacterial biofabrics based on SF and PEI to be utilized in implants as a reinforcing and antibacterial agent. Core-shell nanofibers proposed in this study are expected to prolong the antibacterial effect.
References
Karatepe, U. Y., & Ozdemir, T. (2020, April 15). Improving mechanical and antibacterial properties of PMMA via polyblend electrospinning with silk fibroin and polyethyleneimine towards dental applications. Bioactive Materials. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452199X20300578