Tissue Engineering
Eleni Xhupi
Student
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, United States
Brian N.K Ruliffson
PHD student
Worcester Polytetic Institute, Massachusetts, United States
Catherine F. Whittington
Assistant Professor
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, United States
There was more growth and proliferation of HDLECs in Group 1 with 97% viability compared to 74% in Group 2 as shown in (Figures 1 and 2). There did not appear to be a stark difference in Group 3 and 4 cell viability compared to Group 1. Stiffening of the matrix prior to introduction of cells likely created a favorable environment for cell attachment and growth, while stiffening after seeding may have rendered cells less adaptable to change. To better understand how the cells that had attached to the progressively stiffened collagen, Group 2, a primary antibody to VE- Cadherin was applied. In Figure 3, Group 2 results showed that the HDLECs were not greatly impacted by the photoinitator, showing similar morphology observed to LEC’s cultured on 2D surfaces. This positive staining suggests that although viability was lower in Group 2, cells still attached to ColMA and retained cell integrity when compared with controls.
Overall, the addition of RUT within and on top of ColMA shows promising results based on reasonable levels of cell death and normal cell phenotype. Further work must be done with additional replicate experiments to draw a definitive conclusion for RUT as a photoinitiator for progressive stiffening of ColMA. Future work will include introducing an experimental group to assess RUT retention and evaluating the effects of stiffening on cell-cell junction formation to gain more insight into the effects of fibrosis on lymphatic capillary function.