Immunoengineering
Trevor W.M Ung (he/him/his)
Graduate student
University of Chicago, United States
Jorge E. Gomez Medellin, PhD (he/him/his)
Postdoctoral scholar
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Adam Weiss
PhD
University of Chicago, United States
Peter Deak, PhD
Assistant Professor
Drexel University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Aaron Esser-Kahn
Professor of Molecular Engineering
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Melody Swartz
William B. Ogden Professor of Molecular Engineering and Vice Dean for Faculty Affairs
University of Chicago Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, United States
Targeting ligands (TLs) were synthsized using standard Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis, and consisted of the binding peptide, an ethylene glycol spacer, and palmitic acid tail (Fig. 1A). TLs were purified by RP-HPLC and purity assessed by analytical HPLC and LCMS. Liposomes were prepared by thin film hydration and extrusion. DSPC, DSPE-PEG2000, TLs, cholesterol, and fluorescent dye were dissolved in 1:1 CHCl3:MeOH, dried under vacuum, rehydrated in PBS, sonicated, and extruded through a 100 nm filter. Liposome size was measured by DLS. To test LEC uptake in vitro, fluorescently labelled liposomes were added to murine LECs for 24 hours, then analyzed by flow cytometry and microscopy. To test LEC uptake in vivo, mice were injected intradermally with fluorescent nanocarriers, and after 24 hours the draining LNs were analyzed by flow cytometry. To test uptake dependency on VEGFR3 expression, we also injected nanocarriers in VEGFR3lox/loxProx1Cre/ERT2 mice.
Binding peptides and control (non-binding) peptides for LEC-specific receptors have previously been identified3-8. We synthesized targeting ligands (TLs) consisting of binding or control peptide, an ethylene glycol (EG) spacer, and palmitic acid tails for incorporation into PEGylated liposomes (Fig 1A). EG spacers have been shown to promote cell targeting by improving peptide display above the PEG corona of liposomes9. Liposomes were 40-50 nm in diameter, meeting the 10-100 nm range known to allow optimal lymphatic drainage10. In in vitro studies, we observed preferential uptake of VEGFR3-TL liposomes by LECs compared to Ctrl-TL liposomes. We also determined the optimal targeting ligand incorporation to be 5-10 mol% of total liposome lipid content in vitro. In vivo, we observed a twofold increase in both the proportion of LECs containing VEGFR3-TL liposomes (Fig. 1B), and the amount of VEGFR3-TL liposomes taken up, compared to Ctrl-TL liposomes. In addition, we did not observe any differences between VEGFR3-TL and Ctrl-TL liposome uptake in any other LN cell compartment. We also confirmed that 5-10 mol% of VEGFR3-TL was the optimal targeting ligand concentration in vivo. Finally, to determine if this preferential uptake occurs through VEGFR3 targeting, we used a conditional VEGFR3 knockout model and showed a reduction in LEC uptake of VEGFR3-TL liposomes.
Here we show the development of several LEC-specific receptor targeting ligands (TLs) to deliver nanocarriers to LECs. One highly LEC-specific targeted receptor, VEGFR3, allows preferential liposomal delivery to LECs and we show that this uptake is VEGFR3-mediated. We are evaluating if combinations of targeting ligands can be used to further improve LEC-specific nanocarrier delivery. While TLs were used in liposomes, these targeting strategies are applicable to other types of self-assembling nanocarriers such as polymersomes, which have also been used to encapsulate various antigens and adjuvant for vaccination. Future studies will use LEC-targeting nanocarriers for vaccine delivery, to understand the potential role LECs can play in improving the robustness of vaccine-induced immunity.
(1) Vokali, E., Yu, S.S. et al., Nat Commun 11, 538 (2020)
(2) Tamburini, B.A. et al., Nat Commun 5, 3989 (2014)
(3) Shi, L.F. et al., J Gynecol Oncol 26(4), 327-335 (2015)
(4) Teesalu, T. et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(38), 16157-16162 (2009)
(5) Roth, L. et al., Oncogene 31, 2754-3763 (2011)
(6) Liu, Q. et al., ACS Nano 13(4), 4778-4974 (2019)
(7) Lee, G.Y. et al., J Control Release 155(2), 211-217 (2011)
(8) Couet, J. et al., J Biol Chem 272(10), 6525-6533 (1997)
(9) Stefanick, J.F. et al., J Control Release 311-312, 190-200 (2019)
(10) Reddy, S.T. et al., Nat Biotechnol 25, 1159-1164 (2007)