Biomedical Imaging and Instrumentation
Connor Huggins
Student (Undergraduate
Louisiana Tech University
Cedar Park, Texas, United States
Shailesh Gardas
PhD Student
East Carolina University, United States
Caroline Brown
Student (Graduate)
East Carolina University, United States
Katie Woosley
Student (Graduate)
East Carolina University, United States
Jessica Cassidy
Assistant Proffesor
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
Swati Surkar
Assistant Proffesor
East Carolina University, United States
Results/Discussion: All the participating children demonstrated contralesional CST organization at baseline. The average unaffected cortex RMT was 68±13.1. There was a significant negative correlation between the RMT and NHPT (R=0.43, P=0.05) and UR (R= -0.27, P=0.04). Children with reduced motor cortex excitability indicated by higher RMT had greater impairments in fine motor and bimanual function, respectively. Post-HABIT, 66% of the participating children had a positive shift from contralesional to bilateral CST organization. There was a significant decrease in RMT from pre- to post-HABIT, which indicates an increase in motor cortex excitability after intensive therapy. Additionally, area under the recruitment curve increased from pre- 6.44±5.95 to post-HABIT 9.52±8.41, which further indicates an increase in motor cortex excitability after HABIT. Post-HABIT, there were also significant improvements in gross motor function (BBT change score= 3±1.3 blocks), fine motor function (NHPT change score= -15.95±58.19 sec, JHFT change score= -23.2±33.7 sec), bimanual hand use (UR change score= 0.04±0.08).
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1950507. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
[1] Smorenburg A et. al. Neurohabilt (2016). 31(3) 250-260.
[2] Friel K et. al. Neurohabilt (2016). 30(9) 834-844.
[3] Rich T et. al. Clin EEG Neurosci (2020). 51(3) 185-190.
[4] Kuo H et. al. DMCN (2016). 59(1) 65-71.
[5] Nardone R et. al. NCCN (2021). 51(5) 391-408